Skip to main content
Testkube 2.8.0 is out! Autonomous AI Agents, Custom AI Models, fail-fast and input/output parameters for Workflows, and much more. Read More

testkube-enterprise-api-2.8.4_linux_arm64

digestsha256:8f92cca07784f206664faab21cdc360caa37e9725f2618a5bebc905645241185
vulnerabilitiescritical: 0 high: 8 medium: 9 low: 2 unspecified: 9
platformlinux/arm64
size68 MB
packages451
critical: 0 high: 4 medium: 7 low: 0 github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2 2.12.5 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/nats-io/nats-server@2.12.5#v2
high 8.6: CVE--2026--33216 Plaintext Storage of a Password

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score8.6
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score0.044%
EPSS Percentile13th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server provides an MQTT client interface.

Problem Description

For MQTT deployments using usercodes/passwords: MQTT passwords are incorrectly classified as a non-authenticating identity statement (JWT) and exposed via monitoring endpoints.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

Ensure monitoring end-points are adequately secured.

Best practice remains to not expose the monitoring endpoint to the Internet or other untrusted network users.

high 7.5: CVE--2026--33218 Improper Input Validation

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.166%
EPSS Percentile38th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server allows hub/spoke topologies using "leafnode" connections by other nats-servers.

Problem Description

A client which can connect to the leafnode port can crash the nats-server with a certain malformed message pre-authentication.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

  1. Disable leafnode support if not needed.
  2. Restrict network connections to your leafnode port, if plausible without compromising the service offered.

References

high 7.4: CVE--2026--33247 Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score7.4
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.033%
EPSS Percentile10th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server provides an optional monitoring port, which provides access to sensitive data. The nats-server can take certain configuration options on the command-line instead of requiring a configuration file.

Problem Description

If a nats-server is run with static credentials for all clients provided via argv (the command-line), then those credentials are visible to any user who can see the monitoring port, if that too is enabled.

The /debug/vars end-point contains an unredacted copy of argv.

Patches

Fixed in nats-server 2.12.6 & 2.11.15

Workarounds

The NATS Maintainers are bemused at the concept of someone deploying a real configuration using --pass to avoid a config file, but also enabling monitoring.

Configure credentials inside a configuration file instead of via argv.

Do not enable the monitoring port if using secrets in argv.

Best practice remains to not expose the monitoring port to the Internet, or to untrusted network sources.

high 7.1: CVE--2026--33217 Incorrect Authorization

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score7.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.027%
EPSS Percentile8th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server provides an MQTT client interface.

Problem Description

When using ACLs on message subjects, these ACLs were not applied in the $MQTT.> namespace, allowing MQTT clients to bypass ACL checks for MQTT subjects.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

None.

medium 6.5: CVE--2026--33215 Improper Authentication

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score6.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score0.015%
EPSS Percentile3rd percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server provides an MQTT client interface.

Problem Description

Sessions and Messages can by hijacked via MQTT Client ID malfeasance.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

None.

Resources

medium 6.4: CVE--2026--33246 Improper Authentication

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score6.4
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score0.026%
EPSS Percentile7th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server allows hub/spoke topologies using "leafnode" connections by other nats-servers. NATS messages can have headers.

Problem Description

The nats-server offers a Nats-Request-Info: message header, providing information about a request. This is supposed to provide enough information to allow for account/user identification, such that NATS clients could make their own decisions on how to trust a message, provided that they trust the nats-server as a broker.

A leafnode connecting to a nats-server is not fully trusted unless the system account is bridged too. Thus identity claims should not have propagated unchecked.

Thus NATS clients relying upon the Nats-Request-Info: header could be spoofed.

Does not directly affect the nats-server itself, but the CVSS Confidentiality and Integrity scores are based upon what a hypothetical client might choose to do with this NATS header.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

None.

medium 6.4: CVE--2026--33223 Authentication Bypass by Spoofing

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score6.4
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score0.026%
EPSS Percentile7th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server offers a Nats-Request-Info: message header, providing information about a request.

Problem Description

The NATS message header Nats-Request-Info: is supposed to be a guarantee of identity by the NATS server, but the stripping of this header from inbound messages was not fully effective.

An attacker with valid credentials for any regular client interface could thus spoof their identity to services which rely upon this header.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

None.

medium 5.3: CVE--2026--33219 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score5.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score0.079%
EPSS Percentile23rd percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server offers a WebSockets client service, used in deployments where browsers are the NATS clients.

Problem Description

A malicious client which can connect to the WebSockets port can cause unbounded memory use in the nats-server before authentication; this requires sending a corresponding amount of data.

This is a milder variant of NATS-advisory-ID 2026-02 (aka CVE-2026-27571; GHSA-qrvq-68c2-7grw). That earlier issue was a compression bomb, this vulnerability is not. Attacks against this new issue thus require significant client bandwidth.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

Disable websockets if not required for project deployment.

medium 4.9: CVE--2026--33222 Improper Authorization

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score4.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.025%
EPSS Percentile7th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The persistent storage feature, JetStream, has a management API which has many features, amongst which are backup and restore.

Problem Description

Users with JetStream admin API access to restore one stream could restore to other stream names, impacting data which should have been protected against them.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

If developers have configured users to have limited JetStream restore permissions, temporarily remove those permissions.

medium 4.3: CVE--2026--33249 Incorrect Authorization

Affected range
>=2.12.0-preview.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score4.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score0.027%
EPSS Percentile8th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

The nats-server supports telemetry on messages, using the per-message NATS headers.

Problem Description

A valid client which uses message tracing headers can indicate that the trace messages can be sent to an arbitrary valid subject, including those to which the client does not have publish permission.

The payload is a valid trace message and not chosen by the attacker.

Affected Versions

Any version before v2.12.6 or v2.11.15

Workarounds

None.

medium 4.2: CVE--2026--33248 Improper Authentication

Affected range
>=2.12.0-RC.1
<2.12.6
Fixed version2.12.6
CVSS Score4.2
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score0.018%
EPSS Percentile5th percentile
Description

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

One authentication model supported is mTLS, deriving the NATS client identity from properties of the TLS Client Certificate.

Problem Description

When using mTLS for client identity, with verify_and_map to derive a NATS identity from the client certificate's Subject DN, certain patterns of RDN would not be correctly enforced, allowing for authentication bypass.

This does require a valid certificate from a CA already trusted for client certificates, and DN naming patterns which the NATS maintainers consider highly unlikely.

So this is an unlikely attack. Nonetheless, administrators who have been very sophisticated in their DN construction patterns might conceivably be impacted.

Affected Versions

Fixed in nats-server 2.12.6 & 2.11.15

Workarounds

Developers should review their CA issuing practices.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 1 low: 0 github.com/docker/docker 28.5.2+incompatible (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/docker/docker@28.5.2%2Bincompatible
high 8.8: CVE--2026--34040 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

Affected range<29.3.1
Fixed versionNot Fixed
CVSS Score8.8
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score0.014%
EPSS Percentile2nd percentile
Description

Summary

A security vulnerability has been detected that allows attackers to bypass authorization plugins (AuthZ) under specific circumstances. The base likelihood of this being exploited is low.

This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-41110.

Impact

If you don't use AuthZ plugins, you are not affected.

Using a specially-crafted API request, an attacker could make the Docker daemon forward the request to an authorization plugin without the body. The authorization plugin may allow a request which it would have otherwise denied if the body had been forwarded to it.

Anyone who depends on authorization plugins that introspect the request body to make access control decisions is potentially impacted.

Workarounds

If unable to update immediately:

  • Avoid using AuthZ plugins that rely on request body inspection for security decisions.
  • Restrict access to the Docker API to trusted parties, following the principle of least privilege.

Credits

Resources

medium 6.8: CVE--2026--33997 Off-by-one Error

Affected range<29.3.1
Fixed versionNot Fixed
CVSS Score6.8
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.013%
EPSS Percentile2nd percentile
Description

Summary

A security vulnerability has been detected that allows plugins privilege validation to be bypassed during docker plugin install. Due to an error in the daemon's privilege comparison logic, the daemon may incorrectly accept a privilege set that differs from the one approved by the user.

Plugins that request exactly one privilege are also affected, because no comparison is performed at all.

Impact

If plugins are not in use, there is no impact.

When a plugin is installed, the daemon computes the privileges required by the plugin's configuration and compares them with the privileges approved during installation. A malicious plugin can exploit this bug so that the daemon accepts privileges that differ from what was intended to be approved.

Anyone who depends on the plugin installation approval flow as a meaningful security boundary is potentially impacted.

Depending on the privilege set involved, this may include highly sensitive plugin permissions such as broad device access.

For consideration: exploitation still requires a plugin to be installed from a malicious source, and Docker plugins are relatively uncommon. Docker Desktop also does not support plugins.

Workarounds

If unable to update immediately:

  • Do not install plugins from untrusted sources
  • Carefully review all privileges requested during docker plugin install
  • Restrict access to the Docker daemon to trusted parties, following the principle of least privilege
  • Avoid relying on plugin privilege approval as the only control boundary for sensitive environments

Credits

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/buger/jsonparser 1.1.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/buger/jsonparser@1.1.1
high 7.5: CVE--2026--32285 Out-of-bounds Read

Affected range<=1.1.1
Fixed version1.1.2
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.054%
EPSS Percentile17th percentile
Description

The Delete function fails to properly validate offsets when processing malformed JSON input. This can lead to a negative slice index and a runtime panic, allowing a denial of service attack.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4 4.1.3 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/go-jose/go-jose@4.1.3#v4
high 7.5: CVE--2026--34986 Uncaught Exception

Affected range<4.1.4
Fixed version4.1.4
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Impact

Decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the alg field indicates a key wrapping algorithm (one ending in KW, with the exception of A128GCMKW, A192GCMKW, and A256GCMKW) and the encrypted_key field is empty. The panic happens when cipher.KeyUnwrap() in key_wrap.go attempts to allocate a slice with a zero or negative length based on the length of the encrypted_key.

This code path is reachable from ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() followed by Decrypt() on the resulting object. Note that the parse functions take a list of accepted key algorithms. If the accepted key algorithms do not include any key wrapping algorithms, parsing will fail and the application will be unaffected.

This panic is also reachable by calling cipher.KeyUnwrap() directly with any ciphertext parameter less than 16 bytes long, but calling this function directly is less common.

Panics can lead to denial of service.

Fixed In

4.1.4 and v3.0.5

Workarounds

If the list of keyAlgorithms passed to ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() does not include key wrapping algorithms (those ending in KW), your application is unaffected.

If your application uses key wrapping, you can prevalidate to the JWE objects to ensure the encrypted_key field is nonempty. If your application accepts JWE Compact Serialization, apply that validation to the corresponding field of that serialization (the data between the first and second .).

Thanks

Thanks to Datadog's Security team for finding this issue.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/docker/cli 29.3.0+incompatible (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/docker/cli@29.3.0%2Bincompatible
high : CVE--2025--15558

Affected range>=19.03.0+incompatible
Fixed versionNot Fixed
EPSS Score0.023%
EPSS Percentile6th percentile
Description

Docker CLI Plugins: Uncontrolled Search Path Element Leads to Local Privilege Escalation on Windows in github.com/docker/cli

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 1 github.com/go-git/go-git/v5 5.16.5 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/go-git/go-git@5.16.5#v5
medium 5.0: CVE--2026--34165 Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

Affected range
>=5.0.0
<=5.17.0
Fixed version5.17.1
CVSS Score5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.013%
EPSS Percentile2nd percentile
Description

Impact

A vulnerability has been identified in which a maliciously crafted .idx file can cause asymmetric memory consumption, potentially exhausting available memory and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition.

Exploitation requires write access to the local repository's .git directory, it order to create or alter existing .idx files.

Patches

Users should upgrade to v5.17.1, or the latest v6 pseudo-version, in order to mitigate this vulnerability.

Credit

The go-git maintainers thank @kq5y for finding and reporting this issue privately to the go-git project.

low 2.8: CVE--2026--33762 Improper Validation of Array Index

Affected range<=5.17.0
Fixed version5.17.1
CVSS Score2.8
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score0.014%
EPSS Percentile2nd percentile
Description

Impact

go-git’s index decoder for format version 4 fails to validate the path name prefix length before applying it to the previously decoded path name. A maliciously crafted index file can trigger an out-of-bounds slice operation, resulting in a runtime panic during normal index parsing.

This issue only affects Git index format version 4. Earlier formats (go-git supports only v2 and v3) are not vulnerable to this issue.

An attacker able to supply a crafted .git/index file can cause applications using go-git to panic while reading the index. If the application does not recover from panics, this results in process termination, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.

Exploitation requires the ability to modify or inject a Git index file within the local repository in disk. This typically implies write access to the .git directory.

Patches

Users should upgrade to v5.17.1, or the latest v6 pseudo-version, in order to mitigate this vulnerability.

Credit

go-git maintainers thank @kq5y for finding and reporting this issue privately to the go-git project.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 1 github.com/cloudflare/circl 1.6.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/cloudflare/circl@1.6.1
low 2.9: CVE--2026--1229 Incorrect Calculation

Affected range<1.6.3
Fixed version1.6.3
CVSS Score2.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/S:N/AU:Y/U:Amber
EPSS Score0.022%
EPSS Percentile6th percentile
Description

The CombinedMult function in the CIRCL ecc/p384 package (secp384r1 curve) produces an incorrect value for specific inputs. The issue is fixed by using complete addition formulas. ECDH and ECDSA signing relying on this curve are not affected.

The bug was fixed in v1.6.3.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 0 unspecified: 7stdlib 1.26.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/stdlib@1.26.1
unspecified : CVE--2026--33810

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint.

This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32289

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect escaping being applied.

These issues could cause actions within JS template literals to be incorrectly or improperly escaped, leading to XSS vulnerabilities.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32288

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32283

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service.

This only affects TLS 1.3.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32282

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root.

The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which Root.Chmod uses to avoid symlink traversal. Root.Chmod checks its target before acting and returns an error if the target is a symlink lying outside the root, so the impact is limited to cases where the target is replaced with a symlink between the check and operation.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32281

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service.

This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

unspecified : CVE--2026--32280

Affected range
>=1.26.0-0
<1.26.2
Fixed version1.26.2
Description

During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 0 unspecified: 2github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 5.9.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/jackc/pgx@5.9.1#v5
unspecified : CVE--2026--33816

Affected range>=0
Fixed versionNot Fixed
Description

Memory-safety vulnerability in github.com/jackc/pgx/v5.

unspecified : CVE--2026--33815

Affected range>=0
Fixed versionNot Fixed
Description

Memory-safety vulnerability in github.com/jackc/pgx/v5.